CSLA 3.5: Can you mix managed and unmanaged properties in the same class?

CSLA 3.5: Can you mix managed and unmanaged properties in the same class?

Old forum URL: forums.lhotka.net/forums/t/5641.aspx


rsbaker0 posted on Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Sorry if this has already been covered, but can you register only "some" of the fields in your class for automatic property management in CSLA 3.5 and still handle some of your properties/fields using pre-CSLA 3.5 code?

On a related note, can you still use "pseudo" property names in validation rules if you are using managed properties? (e.g. the property doesn't have to really exist -- you can call PropertyHasChanged() for a non-existent property and fire validation rules.)

JoeFallon1 replied on Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Based on my reading of prior comments I say the answer is Yes to all questions.

Joe

 

Copyright (c) Marimer LLC